There is no GNU Lesser General Public License version 2; it's either GNU
Library General Public License version 2, or GNU Lesser General Public
License version 2.1.
Copy-pasta from GPL instead of LGPL.
Also, there is no GNU Lesser General Public License version 2; either
it's the GNU Library General Public License version 2, or it's the GNU
Lesser General Public License version 2.1.
If we "release" the button first, the drag will be eventually cancelled,
we must first signal GDK_DROP_FINISHED, and then release the button so
the success status prevails.
It doesn't make a lot of sense to have this stored as data offer data,
rather together with the source_targets array, which is what we're
poking here in the end.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758713
Dissociate ownership from our maintenance of wl_data_source objects.
The only place where ownership must be updated together is
data_source.cancelled, for the other places GDK should take care of
setting up the right ownership, even if at a different order than
we'd expect here.
This fixes GTK+ apps on wayland being locally confused about the
current selection ownership. Because gtk_selection_add_targets()
results in a wl_data_source being created, and ownership being
updated right away, early callers of this will change the ownership
even if the widget it's being called on didn't explicitly request
the selection ownership yet.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758660
Just like it happens for window dragging, we're likely to not see the
matching button release for this event, so we must reset the controller
manually here.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758661
After the grab is finished, we would expect an enter event, and
GDK updating internally the cursor for that window and device.
This means there is no need at all to store it separately in the
backend.
As a side effect, animated cursors are now also possible on grab
icons.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735847
The way master devices detach from their other master counterpart is
vulnerable to infinite recursion due to the way we first recurse on
the other device before clearing the pointer, this may happen if
that last reference to the other master device is held by the
device->associated field.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732742
Other backends take care of the cairo surface destruction in
GdkWindow::destroy. We must do the same here, or the cairo_surface
and its corresponding wl_buffer are left dangling.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747295
tracker:uri-is-descendant/parent has the unfortunate side effect of
rendering the collation mechanisms in the database useless, so those
require full table scans to be validated.
Performing these as pure string comparisons will perform much better,
as those allow the underlying sqlite to rely on its own collation
to perform the search, which can be significantly faster with many
elements in the database.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758407
If the window has not yet been created, then we can't set the invisible
cursor yet. This can happen in situations where the widget is in a
revealer with type-to-search functionality.
We were using that range for the extra buttons after left/right/middle,
while this is harmless for clients not handling extra buttons (we
used to translate those button events into scroll events in x11 anyway)
this will be unexpected for clients that do handle additional mouse
buttons themselves (eg. back/forward buttons present in some mice).
In order to remain compatible with X11, those need to be assigned from
button 8 onwards.
Also, include input.h, and stop using magic numbers here.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758072
Commit 1266d15c4 also broke Xwayland, as it does the same trick
than VMWare pointers. Let's extend the heuristic to check for "pointer"
in the device name, what can possibly go wrong...
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757358
VMWare seems to create mouse devices with abs axes which confuses
our detection of single-touch touchscreens. Those have though a
name we can match on ("VirtualPS/2 VMware VMMouse"), it should
be pretty safe to assume that no real touchscreens have "mouse"
in their name...
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757358
We currently just look for a master device with input source MOUSE.
After recent changes to the way input devices are classified, xwayland
on my system comes up with a virtual core pointer that has input
source TOUCHSCREEN. This was causing assertion failures. Be a little
more careful and accept a touchscreen as core pointer, if there is
no mouse.
Since we are now interpreting button press events and
make our own double-click determination, we should not
handle double-click events that are generated by GDK.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757950
When loading a nonexisting CSS file using
gtk_css_provider_load_from_file() or gtk_css_provider_load_from_path()
we would emit the error using a NULL scanner. Don't do that, because
we'll have a NULL section in that case and error handlers don't like
that.
Testcase attached.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277959
Since the change to use GtkPlacesView we don't want to show
internal storage on the sidebar.
In our case we were checking for drive_can_eject and
drive_is_media_removable.
However for some external hard drives it's reported that they
are not ejectable nor the have removable media. So the only
attribute that they have different from internal drives is that
they can be stopped.
So check for if the drive can be stopped to decide if it is
external or internal.
On the way realized we don't need to check for the mounts associated
with the volume to know if the volume can be ejected or not. So remove
that code.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756589
When moving/scrolling a child window we can't use the current clip
region to limit what is invalidated, because there may be a pixel
cache that listens for changes outside the clip region. Instead
invalidate the entire area and rely on the invalidation code to limit
the repaint to the actually visible area.
Using lookup_icon() and lookup_by_gicon() with a size multiplied by a
scaling factor is almost certainly going to get worse results than using
their for_scale() variants.
A GdkPixbuf has no scaling factor, so drawing directly from it can only
using a scale of 1, to avoid blurry, fuzzy icons.
You should be using gtk_render_icon_surface() anyway.
It looks like the param spec for interpolate-size was
copied from the line above it, which is a read only property.
There is a setter for interpolate-size, and it is implemented in
set_property().
